Introduction:

      The move toward a global government received a big boost this summer by the introduction of a proposal for an International Criminal Court. Over U.S. objections, the United Nations Diplomatic Conference voted 120 to 7 in favor of establishing an international criminal court to try individuals accused of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression.

Obama's International Order May 25, 2010

Draft Of New NATO Mission Statement Released May 18, 2010

NATO - Not Dead Yet March 09, 2010

Taking Over The World November 24, 2009

VeriChip Buys ID Security Co November 17, 2009

Creating a New World Order: The U.N. Millennium Forum: Reinvention of Global Government by John Loeffler

Quo Vadis America: Three Threats to Freedom by John Loeffler

Beyond Birth Control: The Population Control Agenda (Pt 2) by Dr. Stan Monteith, M.D.

Beyond Birth Control: The Population Control Agenda by Dr. Stan Monteith, M.D

A Chronological History: The New World Order by D.L. Cuddy, Ph.D

Documents

U.N. Conventional Arms Branch - Department for Disarmament

The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World - U.S. Department of State - September, 1961

Millennium Summit Key Proposals -

The General Agreement On Tariffs And Trade (GATT) - Full Text of the Agreement

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) -

Related Sites

International Court of Justice -

Coalition for an ICC Home Page on the International Criminal Court -

Web site of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court -

Is there a Coming New World Order? - Many links to important Global Governance information from WorthyNews

Yahoo! United Nations Full Listing -

News Sources

Positive ID Axes the Verichip That Nobody Wanted - PositiveID (PSID) CEO Scott Silverman says his company has stopped marketing its medical records microchip implant for humans. The reason: No one wants it. The news came not in an investor relations press release or an 8-K filing with the SEC, but in a Florida Trend magazine feature on the company formerly known as VeriChip.

Why Has The US Refused Help Cleaning Up The Spill? - Nearly two months after the BP rig exploded, a definitive date and meaningful solution is yet to be determined for the worst oil spill in the US history. A Dutch news site De Standaard reported that Belgian and Dutch dredgers have technology in-house to fight the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, but the Jones Act forbids them to work in the US. A Belgian group - DEME - contends it can clean up the oil in three to four months with specialty vessels and equipment, rather than an estimated nine months if done only by the US. However, the US has refused the help which could have kept the oil from spreading. The Obama Administration has not waved the Jones Act during this emergency in order to stop oil from gushing to the shores of Florida and Louisiana, yet he is willing to seize BP's assets...

Virginia House Bans Implanted Chips - The Virginia House of Delegates last Wednesday approved a measure that could protect Virginia residents from overbearing employers. The law would make it illegal to implant an identification or tracking device into a person's body without their written consent.

UN Climate Report Used Questionable Sources - The UN climate report that contains an erroneous claim on the rate of glacier retreat also includes references to studies not originating from peer-reviewed scientific literature, some of them linked to environmental activists. A review of references listed in the four-volume 2007 UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report shows that it includes reports linked to various green groups, including WWF and Greenpeace.

Nowhere To Run, Nowhere To Hide From World Gov't - 2009 was the year in which "global" swept the rest of the political lexicon into obscurity. There were "global crises" and "global challenges", the only possible resolution to which lay in "global solutions" necessitating "global agreements". The word "global" has taken on sacred connotations. Any action taken in its name must be inherently virtuous, whereas the decisions of individual countries are necessarily "narrow" and self-serving. There is a whiff of totalitarianism about this new theology, in which the risks are described in such cosmic terms that everything else must give way.